|
Applique and patchwork on raffia
- Kongo vs. Bakuba
Until
the 20th century, the role of applique on raffia cloth was was primarily
functional, not decorative.
Modern Bakuba raffia cloth is often seen
heavily embellished with hundreds of appliques
in contrasting fabric. However, appliques on cloth made before WWI are the same color as the base fabric, are sparsely
and randomly distributed, and unlike the interlaced designs typical of
Bakuba art, these appliques are disparate L, J, or dot shapes. Examination revealed that
unlike the appliques that completely cover more recently made cloths, those
scattered over early examples covered small tears or holes in the that resulted from the softening process previously mentioned.
|
Compare the Bakuba applique cloth at top, made not long after
European contact in 1890, with the one below it, made in the mid-20th century. Click images for details.
|
Decorative
patchwork also appears to be a post-Diaspora Bakuba innovation which like applique may have originated as a means of
repair, as sashiko embroidery did in Japan. The earliest examples limit it to borders; typically the patchwork consists of
regularly alternating squares of dark and light fabric, possibly an adaptation of the checkerboard
embroidery along the edges of cloth (typically worn by men) that were trimmed with ball fringe.
The most common modern method is reverse applique (the foreground is cut
away to reveal a contrasting fabric placed behind it).
Comparing early and
later examples, we can reasonably
conclude that while applique may have been used in the Congo/Angola region during the
18th and early 19th centuries its primary role was functional, and that it and patchwork did not appear as significant decorative elements
until after the end of the US slave trade.
|
"muraqqa'a"
and "Jibbeh"
- Sudanese Arab appliqued tunics
|
Sudanese
jibbeh, c.1909. Click for details. |
Since these
garments originated in the Sudan (northeast Africa) in the late 19th
century, they would not have been familiar to the Africans who were
brought to the US as slaves.
The appliqued tunics worn by the
Sudanese jihadis known as Mahdists have a relatively short
history. Mahdists were followers of Mohammad Ahmad, a Sudanese
Arab born in 1844 who in 1881 declared himself al-Mahdi al-Muntazar
("Expected Savior"), the 10th century "Missing Imam"
whose return would bring worldwide jihad and eventual Moslem
domination. (This is the same Imam
for whose return Iran's Ahmadinejad has prayed at the UN.) |
|
Ahmad
declared jihad against the ruling Ottoman-Egyptians and the British,
who were unpopular for having hurt the economy by disrupting Arab enslavement of the region's
minority black population in Darfur. By the time Ahmad died of
typhus in 1885 the Mahdists controlled the entire region and
instituted strict sharia law. Mahdist rule continued for the next four
years, during which the economy collapsed and half the population
died. Their army was destroyed by the British in 1898, and
their influence never extended beyond Sudan.
|
As evidence of their asceticism
and devotion to Allah, Ahmad's followers, known as ansar, wore
a ragged, torn tunic called a muraqqa'a, derived from a
similar wool garment worn by the early Moslem ascetics called
Sufis. The muraqqa'a
(which in the Arab world refers to a scrapbook) were patched,
apparently intentionally, with colored rectangles, resulting in what
Venice Lamb describes as "a dilapidated form of attire which
translated the life of poverty and austerity at the heart of the
Mahdist ideology into a striking visual image." A muraqqa'a
in the British Museum is thought to be the only one to have
survived.
Over a period of about 15 years
this evolved into the Mahdist leaders' jibbeh, a
carefully-crafted, stylized
and quite standardized cotton version of their subordinates' tunic
which imitated the patching but not the raggedness, reflecting in
Christopher Spring's words the "evolution of the Mahdist state
from a movement of religious zeal under the Mahdi to an increasingly
militaristic autocracy under his successor, the Khalifa."
|

Muraqqa'a
c.1886 |
Since they originated in the
1880s and were worn only by Sudanese jihadis, the Africans brought to
the US as slaves would have no recollection of these tunics.
"Lifida"
- Patchwork armor - Sudanese Arabs /Cameroon
Fulani
|

Sudanese
horse armor c.1899. Click to enlarge. |
If
these quilted patchwork garments were used during the
Diaspora, the rarity of horses in subsaharan Africa would have
limited their familiarity among the slaves brought to the
US. They show none of the "improvisation" and
"spontaneity" of modern African-American
quilts. The
patchwork-covered, quilted armor worn by horses in Sudan and by the Hausa, Bornu and Fulani in northern
Cameroon is often claimed as an origin for African-American
patchwork style. The
Chronicle of Kano, written in 1890, says Kanajeji
introduced quilted armor to the Hausa in the 15th century, but
I could not determine whether it had spread elsewhere before
reports of the Cameroon Fulani using it in their 1804 jihad against the
Hausa, or whether it was used by Fulani in Senegambia. |
Among the
Cameroon Fulani
it was made by organized craftsmen groups under palace
supervision. The earliest examples I have located were
made in the 1890s of colorful imported cloth. Conversely,
the quilted armor worn by the Fulani themselves was made of
plain white stripwoven cloth, quilted in parallel diagonal
rows of concentric squares. The
lethal presence of the tsetse fly in subsaharan Africa's
savannahs and forests makes it unlikely either horses or their
quilted armor were familiar much beyond these ethincities'
home regions. (The tsetse fly is also the reason that
Arab traders headed for West Africa transferred their
merchandise from horses and camels onto human porters as they
reached the southern edge of the Sahara). The Fulani and
Hausa also appear to have been in the minority of Africans
taken as slaves from their respective regions.
Worth noting is that
early examples' careful piecing and regular quilting lack the "improvisation" and "spotaniety"
of modern African-American quilts. |
|
|